|
The Plenipotentiary
for the Constitutionally Special Status of Berlin
A Body of Public Law
The Head of Department
Provisional Seat Königsweg 1 W-1000 Berlin-Zehlendorf 1
Registered – Recorded Delivery Slip
Axel-Springer-Verlag
Bild-Zeitung Berlin Journalist Michael Sauerbier
Axel-Springer-Straße 65
10888 Berlin-Kreuzberg
Your Reference
35 IN 71/99 AG Pots.
Your message of
July 12, 2001
Our Reference
DR/LFP/PB 197-3-07/01
Date
July 16, 2001
Re.
Our Reference Number: Investigation DR/LFP/PB 197-3-07/01
Preliminary proceedings against you due to suspicion of breaching of international law and human rights infringements, of treason and high treason by unauthorised exercise of authority, also misuse of titles and fraud by surreptitious acquisition of illegal rewards
Dear Mr. "former journalist” Sauerbier,
we have been handed documents and witness statements proving that the preliminary proceedings mentioned in the reference are justified.
You know and are aware
that the legal action taken by the Four Powers in Paris on July 17, 1990, using the caveat the Western Forces led by the USA possess concerning the instrument of occupational law "Constitution for the Federal Republic of Germany” by the Western Forces of May 12, 1949 (VOBl. brit. Zone p. 416),
namely deleting the preamble of the instrument of occupational law "Constitution for the Federal Republic of Germany” by then US Foreign Secretary James Baker, the reunification regulation was withdrawn from the Federal Republic of Germany and bestowed upon the Commissary Government of the German Empire wanted and approved by the Four Powers on May 8, 1985,
and,
with the deletion of Article 23 of the instrument of occupational law "Constitution for the Federal Republic of Germany” of the Western Powers by US Foreign Secretary James Baker
the "Constitution for the Federal Republic of Germany ” of May 23, 1949 (BGBl. p. 1) is without area of applicability and thus invalid and that with the invalidity of the "Constitution for the Federal Republic of Germany” the Federal Republic of Germany has sunk being disabled to act,
and
that with the revocation of the law governing citizenship, the Constitution and the other laws and regulations by the Foreign Minister of the Soviet Union Edward Shewardnaze in Paris on July 17, 1990, the instrument of occupational law "German Democratic Republic” of the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics has also sunk being disabled to act,
and that thus,
as has been given on September 22, 1993, by the Social Welfare Tribunal at Berlin under file number S 72 Kr 433/93 in an incontestable ruling,
the contract between the Federal Republic of Germany (sunk being made unable to act) and the German democratic Republic (also sunk being disabled to act) about the reinstitution of the unity of Germany – the Unification Treaty – of August 31, 1990 (BGBl. II p. 889, 891) was not applicable to anyone and could not be instigated,
as one cannot join something like the Federal Republic of Germany that no longer exists.
According to article 2 of the Imperial Constitution of August 11, 1919 (RGBl. p. 1383) in the version valid today, Brandenburg is,
according to the legal regulations of article II of the still valid Control Council Law No. 46 of February 25, 1947 (official gazette of the Allied Control Council Germany p. 262) together with article 2 of the Imperial Constitution and the Constitution of the Free State Prussia of November 30, 1920 (Preuß. GS p. 123) in the version of February 25, 1987,
a Prussian province of the Free State of Prussia that has been enabled to act as of February 25, 1987, and not a state of the Federal Republic of Germany that sunk being disabled to act.
Through the legal action of the Western Powers in Berlin of suspending the Constitution, the complete law, the laws and regulations of the instrument of occupational law State Berlin of the Western Powers on October 2, 1990, the complete the instrument of occupational law State Berlin of the Western Powers has been sunk being disabled to act, and you,
Mr. Michael Sauerbier,
are no longer an accredited journalist according to the lawful Imperial Constitution and the Law of the Prussian provinces Brandenburg and the City of Berlin.
Therefore we are compelled by law to start preliminary proceedings against you in respect to the criminal offences mentioned above.
You are accused of planning, or having tried, or having done so,
to enter the premises of the Diplomatic Mission of the Principality of Sealand with criminal intent, to perpetrate criminal actions for your personal political gain and for avariciously motivated reasons.
With this you knowingly negate the existence of the German Empire as established by a federal (constitutional) court, the existence of the Imperial Commissary Government Empire as established by a court and the Friendship and Consular Treaty between Sealand and the German Empire sanctioned by the United States.
This is evidence of breaching international law, of transgressing human rights, as well as of treason and high treason.
You know that the existence of the State German Empire has been established for example in the rulings 2 BvL 6/56, 2 BvF 1/73 and 2 BvR 373/83 by the Federal Constitutional Court.
You know that the existence of the Commissary Imperial Government and the Commissary Government of State of the now Imperial Free State of Prussia has been incontestably ascertained in decree S 56 Ar 239/92 by the Social Welfare Tribunal of Berlin and in decree L 14 Ar 50/92 by the District Court Berlin,
and
that due to the still valid of the Constitutionally Special Status of Berlin according to the regulations of the Berlin Kommendatura Letters (67) 10 of May 24, 1967 (NJW 1967 p. 1742) the Federal Constitutional Court has now jurisdiction concerning Berlin.
You know that
the ability to act of the Commissary Imperial Government as of May 8, 1985,
of the Commissary Prussian Government of State as of February 25, 1987,
and of the Commissary Government of the Prussian Province of Brandenburg as of November 9, 1989 has been ascertained under direct orders of the United States Office of Military Government Berlin in decrees 13.0.35/93, 13.0.85/93 and 13.0.86/93 by the District Court Berlin.
You know that
the territorial coverage of the Federal Republican Constitution (article 23 GG) has been deleted on July 17, 1990, whereby the Federal Republic of Germany has de jure ceased to exist with ability to act.
You know that
due to this, the "GDR” that had never been recognised in international law could never join the coverage of the Constitution of the "FRG”,
and
that therefore the Social Welfare Tribunal Berlin and the District Social Welfare Tribunal Berlin have from the beginning in incontestable decrees declared the so-called "Unification Treaty” (Einigungsvertrag) as invalid.
You know that
the Plenipotentiary, forced, approved and called up for essential service by the Western Powers, had on November 15, 1987, in the Reichstag already announced the exact date the Wall would fall in 1989.
You know that
the Plenipotentiary for the German Empire has also announced the de facto demise of the FRG by the future proclamation of Berlin to Groß-Berlin (Greater Berlin).
You know that
according to the agreement for the regulation of certain questions in connection with Berlin (Bundesgesetzblatt II 1990, p. 1274) the German sovereignty concerning Berlin is not touched and thus retained the status of October 2, 1990,
and that
all allied decisions and regulations still apply to citizens of the German Empire, to imperial officers and to office holders of the German Empire.
We have to point out to you that
until a peace treaty is signed with all the victorious forces of the Second World War by the State German Empire with ability to act, the SHAEF legislation is still applicable, in contrast to the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic of Germany sunk without ability to act.
Accordingly, anyone contravening the SHAEF laws, after being sentenced, has to reckon with any punishment foreseen by law, including capital punishment, and this is not maliciousness on our part.
This you know.
Your knowledge also stands in view of the actions on your part – that run contrary to international law (especially according to the regulations of the UN and of the SHAEF legislation), to imperial and provincial constitutional law and to the Special Status of Berlin – trying to plan and organise an armed robbery against the Diplomatic Mission of Sealand.
Due to the on-going constitutional Special Status of Berlin, a "bailiff” of the Federal Republic in the de jure non-existent federal state of Brandenburg cannot apply the law of the de jure at the latest since the deletion of the territorial area of applicability of the Constitution in article 23 GG in the first version of May 23, 1949 de jure no longer existing Federal Republic of Germany (see also BGBl. II 1990, p. 889, 890).
According to the BK/L (67) 10 from May 24, 1967, (NJW 1967 p. 1742) that is still in force in connection with article IV of the agreement for the regulation of certain questions concerning Berlin (BGBl. II 1990, p. 1274),
anyone who contravenes the legal contents of BK/L (67) 10
or
contravenes the SHAEF legislation
or contravenes the still valid Four Powers Rights and Responsibilities for and against a citizen of the German Empire
is punishable and has to expect upon sentencing any possible punishment, see article V of the SHAEF Proclamation No. 1 of September 12, 1944 that is still in force (Amtsbl. US Mil.-Reg. Deutschl. Ausg. A p.1)
Who contravenes the actually valid Imperial Constitution as approved by the SHAEF legislator, or the Constitution of the Imperial Free State of Prussia,
or the Constitution of the Prussian province Brandenburg,
will be arrested after the Proclamation by the UN of Berlin to Groß-Berlin (Greater Berlin) following warrants for arrest by that time approved by the Allies and brought for high treason before the courts of the State German Empire by then enabled to act.
This applies specifically also to you,
Mr. former journalist Michael Sauerbier.
In case you should not be sufficiently informed about the actual legal position or about the valid status of Berlin, it is alarming with how little expertise you exercise your "activities”.
However, we are prepared to acquaint you with the actual and valid legal situation.
It is our task to protect the still valid Constitutionally Special Status of Berlin while observing international law, the still valid Constitution of the German Reich, the valid Constitution of the Free State of Prussia, the still valid constitutions of Berlin and other Prussian provinces, the still valid municipal constitution of the corporate areas of Greater Berlin and the agreement for the regulation of certain questions pertaining to Berlin (BGBl, 1990 II, p. 1274).
Further we are administering the arrest warrants already approved by the Allies and the SHAEF Legislator and all criminal offences (like "Salzgitter”) in order to co-ordinate the arrests etc. after the proclamation of Groß-Berlin by the United Nations.
Should the accusations against you prove to be correct, you will be entered in our file of those in breach of the Status of Berlin, of war criminals, Nazis, traitors and high traitors.
You are hereby given once and only once the opportunity to rebut the accusations by furnishing proof
within two weeks.
Postal delivery to us determines the deadline.
Should you wish a personal interrogation, please let us know.
Should we not hear from you within the time limit set above, we assume the correctness of our documents and of the accusations against you (breach of law both international and pertaining to the Special Status of Berlin, treason and high treason).
In that case we will instigate all necessary steps.
After the Proclamation this would, next to the confiscation of all your assets the ensuing expropriation,
lead to your arrest due to treason and high treason and the subsequent sentencing for treason and high treason carrying the punishment you know.
We point out that
after approval of the arrest warrant it is no longer possible for you to appeal and that you will be accountable to the Reichsgericht (Court of Law of the German Reich).
Independent of this we ask you
to cease in the future from any action against the German Empire
and
against the Principality of Sealand.
Citizens of the German Empire, as His Excellency, the Prime Minister of the Principality of Sealand, Johannes W. F. Seiger, a dual citizen of the German Empire and of the Principality of Sealand, as well as the legal advisor and head of the legal department of the Diplomatic Mission in the German Empire, Robert Hülshorst. are not citizens of the Federal Republic of Germany, and therefore are extraterritorial in respect to the administration and the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic of Germany, according to the legal clauses of
- §3 article 1 sentence 1 of the "law about the affairs of free jurisdiction” in the version of September 12, 1950, (BGBl. p. 455) in common law,
- §20 article 2 of the "legal constitution” in the version of the announcement of May 9, 1975 (BGBl. I p. 1077),
of the legal regulations in international law of clause 6 of the preamble and of articles 2 and 6 of the "agreement for the regulation of certain questions concerning Berlin” of September 25, 1990 (BGBl. II p. 1274).
Until the Peace Treaty between the State German Empire empowered to act and the victorious forces of the Second World War there is no assured legality nor a legal union in Germany.
In case of offenses further findings will be formulated.
This, however, would not be of particular import in view of the sentencing for treason and high treason you may expect from the Imperial Court of Justice, respectively following your sentencing by the War Crime Tribunal established by the USA after the Proclamation.
Should we unexpectedly not hear from you within two weeks, we will regard this as a definite avowal of the charges levelled against you and will proceed against you and your accomplices with all the necessary means and rigor.
Yours sincerely
The Plenipotentiary
for the Constitutionally
Special Status of Berlin
– Head of Department –
 Original File (in German) here
|
BACK