January 10, 2000 Preliminary proceedings aimed concerning accusations of high treason

The Plenipotentiary for the Constitutionally Special Status of Berlin
A Body of Public Law – Supreme Investigative Authority for High Treason

(Address)

Berlin, January 10, 2000

Preliminary proceedings aimed at you concerning accusations of high treason

Dear Mr. “Lawyer” XXXXX

we have received documents and statements from witnesses confirming that the preliminary proceedings mentioned above are justified. Thus we are bound to start an inquiry about you for high treason.

You are charged with denying the existence of the state Deutsches Reich (German Reich) as confirmed by the Constitutional Court of the FRG as well as the judicially confirmed existence of the Commissary Government and the Plenipotentiary of the German Reich, further you have negated the legal standing of the Friendship and Consular Treaty between the German Reich and the Principality of Sealand. This would constitute evidence of high treason.

You know that the existence of the German Reich has been determined by judgements 2BvL6/56, 2BvF1/73 and 2BvR373/83 by the Constitutional Court of the FRG. You know that the existence of the Commissary Government German Reich and the Commissary State Government of the Free State of Prussia are confirmed by rulings S56Ar239/92 by the SG (Social Court) Berlin and L14Ar50/92 by the LSG (District Social Court) Berlin. You know that the power to act of the Commissary Government German Reich and the Commissary State Government of Prussia are confirmed under the direct orders of the US Office of Military Government Berlin by rulings 13.O.35/93, 13.O.85/93 and 13.O.86/93 by the LG (District Court) Berlin. You know that the territorial coverage of the Charter (Grundgesetz) (Article 23 GG a.F.) has been deleted on July 18, 1990, whereby the Federal republic of Germany de jure ceased to exist. You know that the “German Democratic Republic” had remained unrecognised in international law and thus never could join the territorial coverage of the Charter of the “FRG”, and that therefore the SG and LSG Berlin from the beginning had declared the so-called “Unification Treaty” as null and void, each time with incontestable judgements. You know that the Plenipotentiary for the German Reich had revealed on November 15, 1997, in the Reichstag the exact date the Wall would fall in 1989. You know that the Plenipotentiary for the German Reich has also already announced the de facto end of the FRG by the imminent proclamation of Berlin as Groß-Berlin (Great Berlin). You know that according to the agreement for the regulation of certain questions concerning Berlin (BGBl, II, 1990, p. 1274) the German non-sovereignty concerning Berlin was left untouched and thus where it was on October 12, 1990, and that all allied decisions and regulations are still upheld.

We have to point out that until the state German Reich that is empowered to act signs of a peace treaty with all the victorious forces of World War Two, the SHAEF Legislation remains in force. Thus anyone contravening the SHAEF Laws has to reckon with any conceivable punishment.

This you know. Your knowledge also applies to the illegal contravention of international law (especially according to regulations by the United Nations and the SHAEF Legislation), the constitution of the German Reich, of Prussia, of the Province and the Special Status of Berlin and thus the non-enforceable notion on your part concerning the disregard of the (diplomatic) immunity of the Premier of Sealand, Mr. Johannes W. F. Seiger, the disregard of the Friendship and Consular Treaty signed by the German Reich and the Principality of Sealand and approved by the USA, as well as the denial of the supreme governmental power of the German Reich represented by the Plenipotentiary for the German Reich.

Based upon the on-going Constitutionally Special Status of Berlin, a “lawyer” sworn in on the national-socialist legal advice law in the de jure non-existent Federal State of Berlin cannot apply any law of the Federal Republic of Germany that is de jure extinct at the latest since September 28, 1990, through the deletion of the territorial coverage of the Charter in Article 23 of the Charter (BGBl. 1990 II, p. 889ff).

According to the still valid BK/L (67) 10 of May 24, 1967, (NJW 1967, p. 1742) in connection with Article IV of the agreement for the regulation of certain questions pertaining to Berlin (BGBl. II 1990, p. 1274), anyone contravening BK/L (67) 10, or the still valid “SHAEF Legislation” or “Four-power Rights and Responsibilities” is punishable and liable if convicted to any possible penalty including the death penalty, see article V of the still valid “SHAEF Proclamation No. 1” of September 10, 1944, (Official Gazette US Military Government Germany, Issue A, p. 1).

Those contravening the Reich Constitution actually in force and ratified by the SHAEF Legislator shall upon the proclamation by the UN of Berlin to Great Berlin (Groß-Berlin) be apprehended following the warrant already approved by the Allies and brought before the then authorised courts of the German Reich for high treason. This then would also concretely apply to you, Mr. XXXXX.

Should you not be sufficiently informed of the actual legal situation and the valid status of Berlin, then it is alarming that you fill your “office” with such a dearth of expertise; however, we will be happy to acquaint you with the actual and valid legal position.

It is our task to protect the still valid Constitutionally Special Status of Berlin while observing international law, the still valid Constitution of the German Reich, the valid Constitution of the Free State of Prussia, the still valid constitutions of the province of Berlin, the still valid municipal constitution of the corporate areas of Groß-Berlin and the agreement for the regulation of certain questions pertaining to Berlin (BGBl, 1990 II, p. 1274).

Further we are administering the arrest warrants already approved by the Allies and the SHAEF Legislator and all criminal offences (like “Salzgitter”) in order to co-ordinate the arrests etc. after the proclamation of Groß-Berlin. Should the accusations against you prove to be correct, you will be entered in our file of those in breach of the Status of Berlin, of war criminals, Nazis and high traitors.

You are hereby given two weeks to rebut the accusations by furnishing proof. Postal delivery to us determines the deadline. Should you wish a personal interrogation, please let us know.

Should we not hear from you within the time limit set above, we assume the correctness of our documents and of the accusations against you (breach of law both international and pertaining to the Special Status of Berlin, high treason). In that case we will instigate all necessary steps. We point out that after approval of the arrest warrant it is no longer possible for you to appeal and that you will be accountable to the Reichgericht (Court of Law of the German Reich).

Independent of this we ask you to desist in the future from any actions concerning the diplomatic representatives of the Principality of Sealand and the trade licence granted by the Prussian State Ministry for Trade and Industry.

Yours sincerely

The Plenipotentiary
for the Constitutionally
Special Status of Berlin